Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Harmony Tan vs Margot Yerolymos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tan vs Yerolymos analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Harmony Tan vs Margot Yerolymos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tan 2 - 0 Yerolymos
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tan has won 46.81% of points on their second serve, while Yerolymos has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tan, in recent form, has won 54.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yerolymos has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tan has saved 60.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yerolymos has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tan has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 39/ 27), with Yerolymos winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 17/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 128/ 124). Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 36/ 20), where as Yerolymos has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tan winning 2 times and Yerolymos being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tan winning 4 and Yerolymos winning 1. The last match between Tan and Yerolymos was at the W25+H Montpellier, 20-06-2019, Second, Clay with Harmony Tan getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tan and Yerolymos have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tan winning 1 times and Yerolymos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tan winning 0, and Yerolymos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.41 while Yerolymos has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tan has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yerolymos has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tan has converted 49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yerolymos has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
189
Rank
90
High
26
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
858
Rank
306
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
55% (337-275)
Career Total W/L
57% (246-183)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$598,698
Career Prize Money
$22,359
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Harmony Tan vs Margot Yerolymos For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tan VS Yerolymos
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Harmony Tan | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:30 | 1:14:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (65/98) | 49% (47/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (35/65) | 74% (35/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (19/33) | 35% (17/48) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 32% (6/19) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (43/95) | 45% (44/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Harmony Tan
Player
Margot Yerolymos
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Harmony Tan | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (46/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (381/313) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 101 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:43 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 299.23 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1272/2334) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (885/1272) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (494/1062) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (125/255) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (990/2240) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (18/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (20/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Harmony Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Harmony Tan
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Elvina Kalieva
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harmony Tan
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Valentina Ryser
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Christina Rosca
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve %
77%
(
24 of
31)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Harmony Tan
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Greetje Minnen
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Katy Dunne
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Kayla Day
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tan Vs Yerolymos Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tan are available here and Yerolymos photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
